The compiler was never the first reviewer
2026.266The compiler screened a human's type errors so a human could read the rest. An agent changes who reads - Go's zero values never reached the screen.
code-review
all tags →The compiler screened a human's type errors so a human could read the rest. An agent changes who reads - Go's zero values never reached the screen.
Arcanist made intent first-class. Claude Code moved it to the prompt. The developer went from author to auditor - and nothing enforces what I meant to say.
The deploy broke. The checks were green. The mechanism measures what it can see - and what it can't see is everything that breaks.
Three AI code-review tools sit on the same model. The one that guarantees coverage did it with a for-loop, not a better prompt.
The PR has 47 comments. None of them are about the approach.
The old failure mode was reading every line equally. The new one is trusting code that looks right.
A dev who didn't speak in meetings and whose PRs were the conversation.
When quality looks suspicious, people stop producing quality.
Pattern recognition lives in the practice. The flinch that catches the N+1 query doesn't survive a full calendar.
The bugs are quieter now. Just wrong assumptions buried in correct-looking code.
Phabricator changed what code review means to me. A note from a few months in.